Would you be willing to talk about your experience as part of a Skype or phone interview? At the UCL Interaction Centre, Dr Charlene Jennett and Zoya Ajani are hoping to understand more about the experiences of Bat Detective volunteers – how did you find out about the project and what motivates you to take part? By understanding your experience at Bat Detective, Charlene and Zoya are hoping to gain valuable insights into ways to improve online citizen science projects in the future.
This work is being conducted as part of the Citizen Cyberlab project, a three-year EU project that aims to study and enhance the opportunities for learning and creativity available to participants in online citizen science projects.
Interviews are between 30 mins to 1 hour, and participants will be rewarded with an Amazon gift voucher. If you think you would like to be interviewed, please email Charlene for more information.
Hopefully the link above should take you to the Youtube page for the first ever Bat Detective hangout, which will start just after 7pm GMT. Once we’re done, that should magically transform into a link so you can catch up with the Bat Detective team again and again and again.
By Kate E. Jones and Kim Mroz
The Bat Detective project has passed its one-month anniversary! Since the launch, everyone who’s gotten involved has been fantastic. We’ve also had quite a lot of press coverage including that on the BBC News website; interviews on BBC Radio 4’s Material World Programme, Irish Radio, BBC World News; and a podcast for The Guardian.
Since our launch (up until Halloween), we’ve had 671 of you register with the site to explore the data our iBats volunteers recorded from Bulgaria. In total you helped us look at 18,729 snapshots and you provided 73,421 classifications – amazing! You found 12,653 bat calls in our Bulgarian data and also 22,275 insect calls and 23,003 machine sounds. We expected that a lot of the bat calls found would those ‘searching’ calls made when a bat is navigating around, and that is indeed the case (8,821 calls or 70% of the total). However the rest of them were classified as feeding calls (1,591) and a really impressive 2,239 calls were social. This is really exciting as comparatively little is known about social calls and this is first time that they have been recorded over such a large area.
We have been really amazed by how much support you have given us and many of you have done thousands of classifications each, for example one person provided over 9,000 classifications! On Halloween we released the Romanian data which of course includes those recordings made in Transylvania (home of Bram Stoker’s Dracula)! Despite what you may have heard about the legend of Dracula, you will not hear any vampire bats (bats that feed on blood) in the recordings. In fact there are only 3 species of ‘vampire’ bats out of over 1200 bat species in total with only one species known to associated with humans and they all live in South America. However, some exciting species that you might hear in the recordings include the Schreiber’s bent-wing bat (Miniopterus schreibersii), which is one of most threatened species in Europe and the European free-tailed bat (Tadarida teniotis) which might possibly be one of the smelliest!
A huge thank you for those of you that agreed to become moderators on the Bat Detective talk and helped field all the questions! There is a constant demand for more information, and you have given us lots of useful feedback about the site. We’ve noticed particular questions about the recordings (and the bats within them) keep cropping up and we have answered some of the most commonly asked questions below, which we would be happy to hear your thoughts about! That’s it for now, watch out for the Transylvanian report coming in a few weeks!
- How can we hear the high frequencies?
Rob covered in his blog how the volunteers used ultrasound microphones to record the sounds beyond our hearing. These are then played back at a much slower speed to be recorded to the hard-drive, which is what we’re classifying here on BatDetective.org… So 0.3 seconds of sound beyond our feeble hearing becomes 3 seconds of audible calls!
- Why can I hear frogs, birds and tigers, but no button to tag them?
The recordings were all made across Europe shortly after sunset, and have been time-expanded (see FAQ #1). This means that it’s very unlikely you’re actually hearing tigers or birds, and if you were then they wouldn’t sound like you’d expect! Instead, we have chirpy bats and roaring insects, whose calls have been lowered in pitch and lengthened in time. So if you hear a noise that sounds familiar, you have to think about whether it would sound as familiar if it was 10 times higher and quicker!
- More examples? I’m not seeing many bats!
The examples we’ve included in the field guide are particularly loud, clean sounds to help with your classifications. However, there isn’t enough room to include all variations of bat, insect and machine sounds! It could be that you’re over-looking the different, slightly obscured or quiet calls … you might like to check out the collections that users have made for more (possibly noisier) examples of interesting sounds!
- Is this a bat or an insect?
There are certain insects sounds (see Fig. 1) that masquerade as bat feeding calls (scroll down in the link) in the spectrograms, and there’s a general rule to help with these. Does the sound have a clicky or a chirpy quality? If it’s a clicky sound, then this is almost certainly an insect!
- If you’re only interested in bats, should I bother with labelling insects and machine sounds?
Yes, please! We’re hoping to branch out into insects too; it would be a shame to waste all of this fantastic data. On the other hand, flagging machine noise can help tremendously with data quality control.
- What happens if I realise I’ve made mistakes? No back button?!
It’s okay! Don’t worry! We obviously appreciate the care you’re taking with the tagging, but if you happen to miss something or you later disagree with your own tag then in the long-run it shouldn’t matter. Hopefully other users will spot these things too and everyone’s opinion will balance out to good classifications!
- What should I do with harmonics?
Most naturally-made sound will contain more than one harmonic. Bat calls and insect sounds are no different!
Sometimes these harmonics are very quiet, and may not even reach the microphone at all (see Tim’s blog) but if there is a nice distinct harmonic (e.g., Fig. 2) then there’s no harm in marking it. Feel free to make a separate frequency range to let us know about harmonics.
- What are these odd un-cut recordings?
Rob’s blog discusses how the processing of an evening’s recordings is meant to work, but sometimes our automated methods break down. Instead of only getting lovely 3 second snippets, there are also a few crazy recordings floating around … you can see some examples here! Don’t worry about these; just ask for another sound (sorry!).
- Audio doesn’t work … help?
The site currently relies on Flash to play the audio recordings. If you’re having problems while using a major browser (e.g., Firefox, IE, Chrome) you may need to update your browser or Flash install to use the latest version. If you’re still having problems, then please let us know on the Help boards.
- I’m not sure about something, what should I do?
Ask us! If you have a general topic in mind, you can start a discussion on the Science, Chat or Help boards or see if someone else beat you to it. If a particular sound has you stumped then Talk about it! The science team, moderators and other users may be just as stumped as you, but (hopefully) they might just have an answer!
We’re very appreciative of all of the feedback you’ve provided, which mostly concerns the mechanics of the Bat Detective site. We’re now at the stage of having a think on what changes we can make to allow you all to help us more easily.
- Improve the tutorial and guide terminology … and the tutorial itself!
The tutorial is at the top of our list of improvements. Hopefully a dedicated page containing a tutorial video, call guide and site-guide will make it easier for new and old users alike to find answers to their questions, and feel more confident while helping Bat Detective. Watch this space!
- Add frequency scales on talk images.
This is also something that we’re very keen to add ourselves. Discussing recordings in Talk will certainly be a lot easier with some reference to frequencies!
- Confirmation button after selecting ‘Next Sound’.
Several users have noted how other Zooniverse projects (e.g., MoonZoo) have some form of confirmation request when the ‘Next Sound’ button is hit while classifying. This would prevent slightly over-enthusiastic clicking leading to missed recordings, and is definitely something that’s possible.
- ‘Did you spot this?’ sounds.
So you can check how well you’re spotting the bats and insects, it has been suggested that every now and then we could give you an already classified sound to look at, and then point out the calls to see if we agree. Another great idea that we can filch (thanks Planet Hunters)!
By Tim Lucas
Knowing whether bat populations are growing or shrinking tells us about the health of the bat population (see Dr Kate Barlow’s blog). It also gives us information about the health of the ecosystem in general, as discussed by Dr Robin Freeman. However, these are relative measures; are there more bats this year than last year? Sometimes we want to know an actual number. Are there a thousand bats? Ten thousand? A million?
For example, if we are trying to conserve a rare bat species we need to estimate the actual number of bats. At very low population sizes inbreeding starts to become a significant problem for conservation. Ten percent fewer bats than last year could mean a decrease from 100,000 bats to 90,000 bats or it could mean a decrease from 1,000 to 900 bats. While both situations are worrying, only in the later case do we need to start considering genetic inbreeding.
So how do we estimate the size of a bat population from our acoustic surveys? This is not a simple problem. If I go out with my bat detector and count 200 bats, what does this mean? Maybe I actually detected every single bat making the population size only 200. Maybe I detected one percent of all bats making the population size 20,000.
In essence the problem is to work out how many bats you expect to detect per hour of surveying. This depends on a number of factors. The flight speed of a species is important. You are more likely to come into contact with bats that fly quickly. If you sit by a motorway you will see more cars than if you sat by a country lane even if the total number of cars is the same on each road.
Secondly the actual area of land that you are surveying is clearly important and this depends on the distance within which you can detect a bat. Louder bats can be detected from further away, just as larger animals can be seen from further away. This means you are surveying a larger area if you are looking for loud species than if you were looking for quiet species.
The frequency of the bat call also matters as high frequency sounds travel less far than low frequency sounds.
As an example, the spectrogram shown has a loud ‘hockey stick’ call at about 25kHz but also a quieter harmonic above it, at about 60 kHz. Even without considering through use of seo services that the harmonic is quieter (it is less bright on the spectrogram) it will travel about half the distance of the lower frequency call. The maths to work out these distances is long and boring so I hope you don’t mind me not showing my working!
So, if we can make a good guess of how large an area we are actually surveying we can work out what proportion of the bat population we saw. Did we survey 1% of land in Europe, or 0.001% and so did we see 1% of the bat population, or 0.001%. Using this information and information about how fast bats fly we can try to work out how many bats there are in total and use this information to conserve them as best we can.
By Dr. Elizabeth Boakes
If you were to look in a mammal field guide you might think we already know where different bat species can be found. However, our knowledge of species distributions is often behind times. Information on changes in a species’ range is usually of higher quality in species with small ranges, simply because these species are easier to monitor. There is therefore a real risk that declines in more widespread species may be overlooked, particularly if these declines occur in the middle rather than the edge, of a species’ range. Indeed, a species range size, as measured by its borders, may remain constant for a long period of time even if local extinctions are occurring throughout its centre, a process known as fragmentation. The species final collapse toward extinction may be so rapid that sufficient conservation intervention cannot be made in time to save the species (see figure).
Widespread species also tend to be overlooked by scientists who, with limited time and funds, necessarily have to focus attention on species already known to be threatened. In the last 30 years this has led to a real dearth of data on more common species. This is extremely worrying since it means that without these ‘biodiversity base-lines’, ecologists will struggle to map declines in previously widespread species and hence may not be able to find their underlying causes. If we do not knowwy a species is declining it makes it far harder, if not impossible, to reverse that decline.
With the help of volunteers, monitoring widespread species across their range becomes much more tractable and means that a better understanding of species ranges over time can be constructed which will prove invaluable in the future should that species start to decline. Volunteer records are as essential to conservation management as museum collections and I like to think of volunteers as curators of nature. In our rapidly changing world it is hard to predict what species will become threatened next but if we are armed with a repository of distribution data we can hope to notice and respond to these changes as quickly as possible. The Bat Detective project, and your key contributions to unlocking the data wtihin it, are therefore a fantastic conservation resource, not just for today but for decades of future bat custodians.
Bats are often referred to as ‘indicator species’ this signifies that a species is considered indicative of some underlying environmental characteristic. As Kate discussed last week, not only do Bats provide us with essential services (such as pest control and pollination), they also indicate how the nocturnal ecosystems they inhabit are faring. A healthy ecosystem should be able to support bats and changes in bat abundance and distribution may indicate underlying changes to that ecosystem (thus ‘indicator’). Bats are also known to be particular sensitive to such changes and thus may make a more effective indicator than other species.
The Joint Nature Conservation Committee has adopted six widespread bat species as an indicator of mammals in the wider countryside (see ‘Indicators in your pocket’: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-4229). Since 1978, records indicate that populations have declined dramatically, but more recent conservation efforts and monitoring programs have helped to produce more positive recent trends. However, in the context of the longer term declines, much more needs to be done to help bat species maintain these gains, and hopefully increase further.
How does this relate to the Bat Detective project? Well, much of these data are from well-established UK monitoring programs, and we have a less clear picture of how bats are faring across Europe and worldwide. The identification of bat calls that you’re providing through batdetective.org will allow us to then identify the species that make these calls and then develop a much clearer picture of the distribution and abundance of these species throughout Europe (and eventually the world!).
So keep up the amazing work! Your wonderful efforts will help us to identify species that are at risk and areas that need better conservation and management!
Dr Kate Barlow, Head of Monitoring, Bat Conservation Trust
For one we need our bats! Bats are an important part of our ecosystems not least because they provide us with all sorts of useful services around the world, including pest control and pollination. And if we know we need bats surely it is a good idea to see how they are doing?
Over the last century bat populations suffered severe declines, both in the UK and across Europe. A combination of different pressures on bats including agricultural intensification, increasing building and development, direct persecution and use of pesticides including timber treatments which severely affected some bats resulted in significant losses of bats over a number of decades. Today all bats and their roosts are protected by law both in the UK and across Europe. To ensure that protection is effective, to find out how well we are doing at preventing further declines in bat populations, and to attempt to improve habitats for bats so that numbers can recover, we need to know how well our bat populations are doing, and this is where monitoring comes in. The Bat Conservation Trust runs a National Bat Monitoring Programme which relies on an army of dedicated bat volunteers spread across the UK who go out in force every year carrying out our bat surveys and sending us data on bats in their areas. We can then put all of this information together to see how well bat populations are faring at the UK level and use the results to ensure conservation work is focused where it is needed. But if that wasn’t reason enough to monitor bat populations, there is more….
What surprises a lot people is the diversity of bat species around the world, from fruit bats in Australia to tiny pipistrelles in the UK. In fact bats account for about a fifth of the world’s mammal species, that’s well over a 1000 different species of bats! In the UK we have 17 different breeding species of bat. They all are active at night, flying around our cities and countryside searching for and catching their insect prey. Each species has different needs, some roost in buildings others in trees, different bats spend their time foraging in different habitats and eat different insects. The common pipistrelle, one of our smallest and most widespread bats, can be seen busily flitting about around dusk in many gardens and parks across the country, feed on tiny flies, hoovering up thousands of midges and mosquitoes every night. Some of our bigger bats like the noctule need a bigger meal to keep them going and will eat larger insects like beetles, and some bat species have very particular needs and will only be found in the best areas of old woodlands where their favourite moth food can also be found. Different bats, in different habitats eating lots of different insects means that bats can tell us a lot about habitats and ecosystems. And as bats are found across the world and sensitive to change we can try to use bats to track global change. In short if we know how bats are doing we know more about the state of our planet.
Bat monitoring can be done in a number of different ways and keen bat workers can be found carrying out bat surveys at all times of year – standing outside buildings on summer evenings carefully counting bats as they head out from their roosts to feed; clambering around winter bat sites peering into cracks and crevices to search for hibernating bats; or wandering around the countryside armed with bat detectors looking for bats in different habitats. All these different monitoring methods produce a lot of data, and the data needs to be entered, stored, processed and analysed. The Bat Detective website will help us to analyse bat data and develop more efficient methods to process the vast amount of data our monitoring produces.
So going back to my question on why it is important to monitor bats, I could simply say because it keeps me in work! Or because I love bats. But there are so many better reasons for us to know how our fascinating and furry friends of the night are faring, from assessing the health of habitats to monitoring global change, there is still so much to learn from bats.
As you know, we have a huge number of audio snippets and we want to know what’s in them! We would certainly never be able to find the bats all by ourselves — There are just that many recordings.
This is where the Bat Detective project steps in. We’re really hoping that citizen scientists will help us to locate and identify bat tweets and insect clicks that have been captured across the globe by the lovely volunteers.
Once we gather your votes on the contents of a snippet, this will highlight the recordings of interest and provide us with labels. On top of hunting for the bats, your labelled sequences of searching, feeding and social tweets will also allow us to analyse the different sounds.
As the number of your identifications grows, the more information we will have; it doesn’t even matter if a recording is given a range of different labels! By pointing out the controversial sounds, we can gain an insight into the calls that are hard to distinguish.
If the majority of your votes on a snippet’s contents agree, then this recording can be compared to other snippets that have been similarly labelled. By finding the features they have in common, and what sets them apart from other sounds, we can begin to automate our quest for interesting sounds.
To help us decide on useful identifying features as an seo company for bats, which could be wildly obvious or devilishly subtle, we can use machine learning. This involves designing a computer program that we can hand our snippets and your voted labels to, for it to then return different ways the sounds can be grouped together. Analysing these resulting clusters will then pave the way for automatically detecting the different bat tweets (and insect buzzes) within any number of snippets!
All the data that goes into Bat Detective has been collected by many wonderful volunteers around the world as a series of individual recordings, each 90 minutes long. Each of these recordings contains thousands of the individual snippets that you see on bat detective. As the bat calls are ultrasonic, we use time-expansion to record them. A specialised microphone records ultrasonic information for a short period (320 ms) and then slows that sound down and plays it into a recorder (slowed by 10x, giving a 3.2 second recording). This results in a long recording that contains thousands of small 3.2 second snippets of audio.
Chopping all this data up has really tested some of our desktop computers. Once you consider that we have 1000s of events, each containing thousands of snippets (and each snippets has a sound file and a spectrogram image), you can see that we very quickly have a lot of files! I recently discovered that copying 4.5 million tiny files to a usb disk can take a while!
We’re really excited about getting people involved in Bat Detective, because many of these snippets contain calls from individuals bats, and individual researchers finding them manually would be impossible! Having everyone help us find these calls not only allows us to try and identify the species making those calls, but will also allow us to try and generate methods to automatically detect bats, insects and other noises in these data.
Bat Detective is an online citizen science project where the public can help to monitor bats across Europe and track changes in the environment by listening to the weirdly wonderful ultrasonic tweets of bats.
Bat Detective project allows visitors to take part in conservation by listening out for bat tweets in recordings collected over 80,000 km of roads across Europe by thousands of volunteers from the iBats program, including bat recordings from the heart of Transylvania.
By sorting the sounds in the recordings into insect and bat calls, bat detectives will help the Bat Detective team learn how to reliably distinguish bat tweets to develop new automatic identification tools.
Bats use lots of different types of sounds, from singing to each other to find a mate, to using the echoes from their tweets to find their way around. Usually bat sounds are inaudible to humans as they are too high for us to hear, but special ‘time expansion’ ultrasonic detectors convert these sounds to a lower frequency, and visitors to Bat Detective can listen to these unique recordings and help the Bat Detective team distinguish different sounds.
One out of every five species of bats is threatened with extinction and better automatic identification tools are desperately needed to quickly process vast amounts of sound data collected by volunteers from bat monitoring programs who survey bat populations each year.
Bats are found all over the world from local parks to pristine rainforests and monitoring their population trends provides an important indicator of healthy ecosystems. Developing new tools that allow the Bat Detective team to interpret population trends from sound will allow bats’ tweets to act as a way to track environmental change.
Bat Detective has been developed by the science team at University College London and Bat Conservation Trust with the development team at Citizen Science Alliance, which runs Zooniverse.org with funding from the Alfred P. Sloan foundation.